Search In BriefOver a thousand pages of free legal information written by our selected team of legal experts |
|||||
Browse Legal Topics |
Ask a Solicitor Online |
||||
|
|
|||||
Football Player Breaking Contracts
Football Players Verbal Contracts
UEFA Financial Fair Play Proposals
Premier League Parachute Payment
Football Player Under Contract Approaching Clubs
Government Involvement in International Football
Professional Footballers' Association
Football Season Tickets Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts
Conduct to Referees in Football
Football Quotas and Home Grown Player Rule
Teams Refusing to Play in Tournaments
Goal Line Technology in Football
Bosman Decision on Football Transfer
Potential Legal Issues in Transfer Window
Footballers Transfer in Season
Youtube and Premier League Rights
Footballers Names in Computer Games
Pub Landlord Showing Live Football
European Law on Selling Premiership Television Rights
Streaming Live Football Matches Online
Reproduce FA Fixtures on Website
Football Clubs Administration Insolvent
Premier League Running England
Dual Ownership of Football Clubs
Third Party Ownership Football Players
Football Agents Fiduciary Duty
Football Agents FIFA Regulation
Football Agents Player Transfers
Sponsorship of International Teams
Different Sponsorship for Different Football Competitions
Footballers Tools of the Trade
There have been a number of occasions in which the European Commission has become involved in issues surrounding football, most notably the mid 90’s decision in the Bosman case.
Following the Bosman case, again due to European Union involvement in the football transfer system, the FIFA Regulations for Transfers were established. The main focus of the FIFA Regulations for Transfers was in relation to younger players with the outlawing of international transfers for players under 18 and the payment of training compensation to teams losing players under the age of 24.
Another aspect however of the FIFA Regulations for Transfers was the introduction of two transfer windows during one season.
During a European Football season running from the end of August until May the following year there are only two periods or windows whereby a team can buy and sell players. The first of these windows runs throughout the off season and comes to an end at the end of August. The second of these windows is for the entirety of January.
The rules concerning the two distinct transfer windows were made compulsory in the 2003-02 football season.
The main reason for the transfer windows is to stop certain teams having an unfair advantage as they will have more money than anyone else in order to buy a player at any stage of the football season. For example before the introduction of the transfer windows the so called big clubs were able to splash the cash after only a few poor results. The smaller clubs simply didn’t have the means to do this and so were considered to be at an unfair disadvantage creating a distortion in the competition.
Stopping a player from moving during the period when the window is closed could be regarded as a restraint of trade as that player is restrained by the rules and regulations of his profession from undertaking his profession.
One of the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the European Union is the right to free movement of workers. The rule regarding the transfer window does on the face of it appear to be in contravention of this rule. If we look to the Bosman decision the key fact of that was that a player no longer under contract with his club could not move without a transfer fee – this was seen to be in contravention of the EC Treaty as it restricted the free movement of workers.
If we apply the same analysis we can see that preventing players from being sold during the periods when the window is closed clearly prevents them from moving freely.
The European Commission has stated that in certain cases there can be good sporting reasons to justify some kinds of economic restrictions with the benefits of team stability and regularity of sporting competition being at the top of that list.
In the Bosman case there was no good sporting reasons to limit the movement of players whereas in the case of the transfer window there is.
The above stated reason in restricting the big clubs spending money whenever they need it is often cited as the main reason for the transfer window being in existence. However, there is a counter argument that the transfer window can in fact put the clubs with less money at a competitive disadvantage.
Following from the introduction of the transfer window clubs have had to plan for the fact that they can only strengthen their squad at designated times meaning that the clubs with huge amounts of money will purchase more players during the transfer window to prepare for any possible eventualities to occur during the season while the window is closed such as injury to key players. This has meant that the potential transfer fees for certain players have gone up as the big clubs may be bidding for them as potential squad players when if the window did not exists they would not bid for them at all.
Furthermore the smaller clubs do not have the ability to strengthen their squads in the same way and so if an injury occurs to key players they will often struggle with their smaller squad.
Prior to the windows being introduced many clubs had guaranteed their Premier League survival by purchasing players just before the end of the season for a final push. Often these were not expensive players but older players who had vast amount of experience but were coming to the end of their careers. Often these players would salvage the season and their own career following one transfer.
It was on such deals like this that many managers have saved their jobs. Now without the ability to do this the knock-on effect of the window has been the loss of many football managers’ jobs.
One of the biggest assets that a small football club may have is developing a hugely talented player which they can then sell onto the bigger clubs making a large profit for themselves. This has been part and parcel of football and in many cases has been the only reason that clubs can manage to stay afloat and avoid going into administration. Now without the potential to sell their assets immediately as the threat of administration looms we can see the potential of many clubs going bust where this would not have happened prior to the adoption of the transfer window.
There are many arguments for and against the football transfer window but FIFA on current evidence seem happy with its existence. As a result of this it is very unlikely that there will be a rule on a decision which seems to meet the approval of the European Commission.
Ask your legal question using the box below and have a response from solicitor or barrister within minutes.