Search In BriefOver a thousand pages of free legal information written by our selected team of legal experts |
|||||
Browse Legal Topics |
Ask a Solicitor Online |
||||
|
|
|||||
All persons who are part of the military in England and Wales are employed by the Ministry of Defence.
The Ministry of Defence is like any other employer and therefore has a responsibility to protect its employees from injury or illness at work wherever this is possible.
In most cases the Ministry of Defence is subject to the same regulations that protect employees, contractors and visitors and must be sure to provide a safe workplace, well maintained and suitable equipment with sufficient training and instruction to use that equipment along with sufficient protective wear as required for certain forms of equipment.
Prior to the Crown Proceedings Act 1987 members of the armed forces were unable to sue the military for injury caused due to the negligent acts of the military. Following the enactment of the Crown Proceedings Act 1987 it is now possible to pursue a negligence claim against the Ministry of Defence in much the same way as against any other employer.
As many members of the armed forces have been negligently exposed to asbestos causing them severe illness – this is a claim which many soldiers have made. However, due to the symptoms of asbestos related injuries happening a long time after the initial exposure it is important to note that a claim cannot be made for asbestos exposure prior to 1987.
The types of accidents that are likely to affect military personnel are as follows:
Most injuries which will occur to personnel of the armed forces will occur outside of conflict.
If an injury was sustained during an active conflict it will be extremely difficult to bring a successful civil claim due to the principle of combat immunity. Combat immunity is likely to apply when enemy forces – or insurgents – are engaged and where service personnel are under attack or are preparing for attack.
The law concerning medical injuries suffered in war zones is extremely complex meaning that each case should be assessed on an individual basis. Injuries that occur in a war zone but that are not related to combat, or the preparation for combat in any way may be able to bring a successful claim for negligence. If this is to be the case the compensation claim will be processed in the normal way.
In each case medical evidence will be required. As is often the case in relation to a claim being brought due to exposure to a particular substance then expert medical evidence may be required to prove that the disease has occurred as a consequence of exposure.
Each military case will have to be heard on an individual basis as some injuries may occur in a war zone which has nothing to do with engaging with the enemy or preparing to do so.
In the event of a serious injury, unnatural death or any other occurrence that is considered to require investigation occurs to a member of the armed forces a Board of inquiry (BOI) or Regimental Inquiry will be made.
This is a statutory form of service which is carried out in accordance with the Queens Regulations.
The inquiry will not be open to members of the press or the public.
The BOI is not a court and is not there to attach blame for the incident, with the main purpose being to establish exactly what happened and why so that future instances can be prevented.
Applicants do not have to wait until they are discharged from the armed forces to make a claim under this scheme.
Claiming under the scheme does not prevent an injured person bringing a claim in the courts. In certain cases the compensation which could be obtained through a civil action would be greater than that through the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme.
If the injury was suffered or the illness started before April 2005 then compensation will be able to be claimed through the War Pensions Scheme. However, you will only be eligible for compensation through this scheme once you have been discharged from the armed forces.
Ask your legal question using the box below and have a response from solicitor or barrister within minutes.