Search In BriefOver a thousand pages of free legal information written by our selected team of legal experts |
|||||
Browse Legal Topics |
Ask a Solicitor Online |
||||
|
|
|||||
Competition Rules in Sporting Exemptions
Free Movement of Firearms for Sport
Requirements for Sports Coaches
Disability Discrimination Sports
Ambush Marketing and Event Sponsorship
Ambush Marketing and the Olympics
Endorsement Contracts in Sport
Sponsorship Agreements in Sport
Promotional Material Sport Grounds
Exclusive Hospitality at Sports Events
Hosting International Sporting Events
|Sport Tickets Terms and Conditions
Sporting Events and Employment Issues
Ticket Touting at Sports Events
Resolving UK Sporting Disputes
Criminal Offences in Sporting Contest
Sports Injury Compensation Claims
Money Laundering in Sport Financial Task Force
Collective Bargaining Agreements in Sport
Government Involvement in Sport
Court of Arbitration for Sport
Code of Ethics Fair Play and Protection of Children
UK Great Britain Football Team
Olympic Games Government Involvement
International Olympic Committee IOC
Olympic Games Effect on Sport Events
Athletes Doping and Criminal Law
Athlete Liability Doping WADA Code
There is specific legislation which has been put in place to deal with the unauthorised selling of tickets for football matches by the following statutes:
The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
The Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006
There has been specific legislation put in place to deal with the unauthorised selling of tickets for the London 2012 Olympic Games by the following statute:
The London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006
Football is the most popular sport for our nation and clearly the 2012 Olympics is the biggest event to be happening to England in the near future but touting is not an activity which is strictly limited to football or the Olympics. There is still a significant black market associated with tickets for international rugby matches and cricket matches such as the Ashes.
The following pieces of legislation can be used to combat the touting of tickets at general sporting matches:
The Fraud Act 2006
The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
The introduction of the Fraud Act replaced the deception offences seen previously under the Theft Act 1986 by introducing a number of dishonesty offences.
Section 2 of the Fraud Act creates an offence of fraud by false representation which is the most clear provision which can be applied to ticket touting.
The following needs to be proven to establish fraud by false representation:
The tout needs to make a representation that he is authorised to sell the tickets
The tout must know that the representation is or might be false
The tout must do this with a view to making a financial gain and/or exposing the buyer to the risk of a loss
Fraud by false misrepresentation applies to transactions over the internet as they are specifically brought within the remit by Section 2(4) and (5).
If a tout is found guilty of fraud by false representation then he will be liable to 12 months imprisonment and / or a fine on summary conviction.
Even the case passes to a trial then a tout convicted of fraud by false representation could be handed down a maximum sentence of 10 years and / or a fine.
This is much more stringent than the penalties handed down by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act meaning that the Fraud Act may be much more of a deterrent to a tout. On this basis it is also possible that a tout selling tickets for football matches may be convicted under the Fraud Act as well as the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act and be sentenced to prison.
Compared to legislation such as Section 166 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act the Fraud Act has not been enacted specifically to deal with touting at sporting fixtures. Consequently it is often harder to convict a tout of fraud by misrepresentation as all the above criteria needs to be met. This may cause significant problems as you have to prove that the tout was dishonest in their actions and that the tout new that statements that he made about the tickets were untrue or misleading.
In order to prove dishonesty two elements need to be present:
An objective test – that various members of the general public would view the conduct as dishonest
A subjective test – that the tout new his conduct to be dishonest
If the tout makes a representation to an individual that a ticket is valid then this may immediately be seen as an untrue statement. The terms and conditions of the ticket will say that tickets bought from unauthorised sources are invalid. The tout will be aware of this so a representation that the ticket is valid would be seen as untrue.
Tests such as this are not required under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act or the London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act.
The money laundering legislation contained with the Proceeds of Crime Act is applicable to any crime meaning that for it to come into play there must have been an initial crime such as fraud by representation under the Fraud Act.
For a conviction under the Proceeds of Crime Act the following will need to be established:
That an individual tout deals with the profits from the illegal sale of tickets
That an individual tout knows or suspects that the profits were gained through criminal conduct
This legislation is used specifically to target touts who work together as a ring of touts and who share their profits etc. If a tout only takes the money for his own personal gain and the proceeds are minimal then this will not caught under the money laundering legislation.
For someone convicted under the money laundering legislation they will be liable to a six months imprisonment and a fine of up to £5,000.
This legislation may not apply directly to sport but there is a greater willingness by the Government to use it in that context to crack down on the unauthorised selling of tickets to sporting matches.
Ask your legal question using the box below and have a response from solicitor or barrister within minutes.