If an individual has damaged goods belonging to another individual then a claim in negligence can be brought in just the same manner as if the damage occurred to any form of property. In order to bring a claim for negligence the following elements will need to be established:
There is however specific legislation which has been developed in relation to specific torts where the harm relates simply to goods rather than any other form of property.
The Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 defines wrongful interference with goods as the following:
Section 2(1) of the Act abolishes the old tort of detinue. This was where there was a wrongful refusal to deliver goods to the individual entitled or in having custody or possession of an individualís goods and subsequently losing them.
Conversion is defined as dealing with goods in a manner inconsistent with the rights of the individual who is the true owner, whereby the individual in possession of the goods intends to deny the owners right or to assert a right inconsistent with the owners.
The key elements thus to be established are as follows:
Examples of conversion are purchasing goods from a thief, selling another individualís goods, destroying anotherís goods etc.
Trespass is defined as the immediate and direct unauthorised interference with another individuals goods.
For trespass to be proven there must be intention on the part of the defendant to deliberately interfere with anotherís goods.
The definition of trespass includes using, removing, touching or destroying anotherís goods. Examples of this are slashing someoneís tires with a knife or running a key alongside an individualís car scratching the paint work.
If the defendant is found guilty of Section 1 wrongful interference with goods the following remedies are available to the claimant as specified in Section 3 of The Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
Order for the delivery of the goods and consequential damages
Order for the delivery of the goods where the defendant has the option of paying damages for the value of the goods
The first two remedies are specifically concerned with conversion whereas the most likely or in fact only available remedy to an individual whom has suffered a trespass or a negligent act in relation to their goods would be damages.
In certain cases where the goods have been detained following the claim the court may order delivery up of the goods.
Section 7 of the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 deals with the situation of double liability. This is where there may be two rights of action for wrongful interference, this could be both conversion and trespass, or where there are two individuals who both have an interest in the goods.
In the case of double liability the Act specifies that one single claim shall be brought by one individual party meaning the single claimant will have to account to the other once the claim has been brought.
There are two defences which can be used against a claim of wrongful interference with goods. They are as follows:
If for example the owner of a car has trespassed onto private land with his car and then has subsequently had his wheel clamped for the offence by the owner of the land then he cannot claim for wrongful interference with his vehicle. By trespassing on the land he is seen to consent to the interference Ė namely the clamping.
Again in the case of a trespasser who trespasses onto anotherís land, the owner of the land is entitled to seize and detain any property which the trespasser brought onto the land with him until the trespasser leaves or if damage has been caused until the trespasser pays for the damage caused.
Use the box below to put your question to a solicitor or barrister. You will usually have an answer back within minutes.