The benefits and negatives of mediation procedure

The nature of mediation

Mediation is one of the available alternatives to civil litigation, which is constantly growing in use. Currently, it is proving to have higher settlement rate than most other ADR procedures.

In comparison to a trial, mediation involves the clients in the process and thus provides for higher client satisfaction with the outcomes. Further, it achieves results more tailored to the priorities of the participants.

Practical benefits of mediation

Client involvement

There are a number of features of mediation which make it an especially attractive alternative to litigation.

Firstly, clients are interested in mediation because it provides for their better involvement in the process. The participants are required to speak for themselves, explain their positions and even talk about their feelings.  

In comparison once a case goes to court, the client rests his case in the hands of his barrister and is completely reliant upon him. In the courtroom, the physical arrangement excludes the parties from the litigation process requiring them to sit at the back behind their barristers and solicitors even though it is their lives and problems at stake. Further, all the conversations take place solely between the barristers and the judge and the proceedings are concerned with legal criteria as opposed to emotions and needs.

In court, the client’s voices are heard through the lawyers therefore, the power rests exclusively with them. 

In contrast, when mediation takes place the clients are the ones effectively in the spotlight. The process is more informal and relaxed. The clients are the ones doing most of the talking, expressing their feelings, concerns and needs.

Taking into consideration the atmosphere of a mediation process, the clients are all on the same level, sat side by side to their legal representatives and are directly facing their opponent. Further, the participants have an opportunity to address each other which proves to be more satisfactory for the parties than court proceedings. 

While there is no judge to apportion blame at the end of the process, the mediator regulates the process without taking sides and in that way allows the parties to come to a suitable solution themselves.

Saving time and costs

The mediation process if successful can mean complete end of the proceedings in question. Therefore, it could resolve all issues without the need of going to court and wasting time and costs in preparation of the case and a full hearing.

Further, the parties together cover the costs for the mediation and therefore no one is ordered to pay the full sum including the costs of the other party unless they themselves agree to that effect.

More practical remedy is achieved

While courts can grant injunctions and decide which side wins and which party is the loser, the mediation process does not focus on finding fault in any of the parties. In addition, there is no strict timetable for mediation so the facilitator is free to conduct the process in accordance with the individuals involved.

Unlock this article now!


For more information on:

  • Negative sides of mediation
  • Could result in increased costs
  • Does not determine fault
  • Could be exploited by someone tactical