Search In BriefOver a thousand pages of free legal information written by our selected team of legal experts |
|||||
Browse Legal Topics |
Ask a Solicitor Online |
||||
|
|
|||||
Self Publishing Versus Publishing House
Remedies for Copyright Infringement
Who can Claim Copyright Infringement?
Criminal Liability for Copyright Infringement
Can Ideas be Protected by Copyright?
Copyright for Freelance Writers
Copyright in Literary, Dramatic and Musical Works
Copyright in Sound Recordings and Films
Copyright in Published editions
Computer Generated Works Copyright
Copyright Protection for Software
Copyright Technological Protection Measures
Internet Service Providers Copyright Illegal Material
Defence of Fair Dealing in Copyright Law
Trade Marks Relative Grounds for Refusal
Defences to Trademark Infringement
Defences to Patent Infringement
Information Commissioner Data Protection Act Powers
Protection of Company Information
Data Protection Requirements for Business
For copyright infringement to take place the owner of a copyrighted work will need to establish that either of the following acts are done in relation to a substantial part of the work without his or her consent of authorisation being provided:
The test for whether the alleged infringement was in relation to a substantial part of the work is a subjective one and will be dealt with on a case by case basis. It is a common misconception that this simply means how much of the work has been reproduced. If a large quantity of the body of the work has been used then this will of course be regarded as a substantial part but often the quality, importance or significance of the extract are just as important. In some cases only four lines of work have been found to be substantial when taking these factors into account.
Secondary infringement is not an infringement concerned with the physical copying of the work but is there to prevent certain activities centred around the infringing article. The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 details the following eight separate acts which will be considered secondary infringement:
In order for secondary infringement to exist any of the above acts will need to have been committed with some knowledge, whether this be actual or imputed, of the original or primary infringement.
The owner of the copyright has the following remedies available to them in a case of infringement:
Fair dealing is when the use of the copyrighted work is fair and not for the purpose of commercial gain even if the use of the work would be considered infringement. Under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 there are three fair dealing exceptions. They are as follows:
The defence of fair dealing in the UK can only be used if it is specifically for one of the above uses explicitly mentioned in the Act. There are also certain qualifications which must be observed for the use to fit in amongst the three fair dealing exceptions. They are as follows:
There are certain other exemptions which will be upheld against a claim of infringement. Amongst them are the following:
The work has been copied for the purposes of instruction and examination. This is a defence even when the whole body of the work is played, performed, recorded or photocopied. A qualification on this however, is that it must not be for commercial purposes and the author must be given sufficient acknowledgement.
Non-profit making (local authority and educational) libraries are allowed to make copies to supply to people requiring to use them for research of private study.
For example photocopying sculptures of statues in public places will not constitute infringement.
Infringement can be exempted on the grounds that it is in the public interest. Examples of this are where the material may be injurious to public life, public health and safety or the administration of justice.
Ask your legal question using the box below and have a response from solicitor or barrister within minutes.