Search In BriefOver a thousand pages of free legal information written by our selected team of legal experts |
|||||
Browse Legal Topics |
Ask a Solicitor Online |
||||
|
|
|||||
Trustees of Discretionary Trusts
Reform Presumed Resulting Trusts
Discretionary Trusts Beneficiary Rights
Types of Grant and Who Can Apply
Inheritance Provision for Family and Dependants
Provision for Family and Dependants
Trustees Appointing Replacement
Perpetuities and Accumulations Rules
What Happens to Your Body When You Die
Formalities of Making a Will - S.9 Wills Act
Mental Capacity and Power of Attorney
Following a persons’ death when the distribution of the assets becomes a reality and the details of the will are made known to the beneficiaries there may become the instance when one or more of those beneficiaries may believe that the will is invalid and may wish to contest the will.
The following six kinds of people are able to contest a will:
The spouse
A former spouse who hasn’t remarried
Children
Step-children
A partner who lived with the deceased for more than two years
Any other dependants
If an individual is unhappy with the terms of a will then it is advisable to seek a caveat to stop the assets of the estate being distributed.
The caveat will last for six months. However, it is renewable and in certain cases can often lead to disputes being resolved before they reach the stage of court.
If an agreement cannot be reached during the caveat stage then there will be two main grounds on which a will be can held to be invalid.
The two main grounds on which a will can be held to be invalid are as follows:
The validity of the will
Financial dependency on the deceased
In order for a will to be valid it must satisfy certain conditions which are prescribed for by the law of probate. If the will fails to satisfy these conditions it can be held to be invalid. There are certain time limits which apply in relation to some of these issues meaning that legal advice should be sought immediately when one of the issue arising.
If a will does not satisfy one of the following conditions one of the above mentioned six people will be able to take action contesting the will:
The will must be made by a person over the age of 18
The will must be made willingly without undue influence from another person
The testator must be of sound mind and fully aware of the meaning of the document
The will must be signed by the testator in the presence of two witnesses who must also sign the document
The witness should not also be a beneficiary or they will lose their own inheritance
A court will always assume that a will is valid. Therefore the onus to prove that it is in fact invalid will be placed firmly on the shoulders of that person wishing to challenge it. If the court decides that there is in fact a doubt as to the validity of the will then burden will shift to those who wish the will to proceed in its existence to prove that it was in fact completed correctly.
If the testator fails to make provision for a dependant then that person is entitled to take action in the courts on the basis that the deceased had a responsibility towards them which was not discharged in the will.
A claim can be made by the following people as a dependant:
A partner
Minor
Mentally disabled person who depended upon the deceased
The Inheritance Act 1975 provides for the situation whereby a relative that was financially dependent on the deceased at the time of death has a right to claim on the estate if they have been left out of the will.
If a dependant claiming on the estate is in fact successful they will not necessarily be provided with a lump sum payment as others may be under the will. Often the court will grant this amount to be paid to the dependant through maintenance payments.
In certain instances the situation can occur whereby an original will is lost and the executor may attempt to prove a copy of the will and obtain a grant of probate.
When a probate application is made to the court they can sometimes be challenged by beneficiaries of earlier wills who have not been included in the subsequent will and who believe that the will had not in fact been lost but was destroyed by the testator during their lifetime. If this can be proven it would mean that the subsequent will would in fact be invalid and the earlier one would be proven to be the correct will.
However, this may be difficult to prove so it is a requirement that detailed evidence must be submitted to prove this claim.
Ask your legal question using the box below and have a response from solicitor or barrister within minutes.