Search In BriefOver a thousand pages of free legal information written by our selected team of legal experts |
|||||
Browse Legal Topics |
Ask a Solicitor Online |
||||
|
|
|||||
Civil Claims Issue Service Particulars Response
Civil Claim Limitation Periods
Joining Participants and Causes of Action
Construction Pre-action Protocol
Judicial Review of Pre-action Protocol
Clinical Disputes Pre-action Protocol
Professional Negligence Pre-action Protocol
Pre-action Protocol for Personal Injury
Pre-action Protocols for Civil Litigation
Pre-action Protocol for Defamation
Letters of Claim for Construction
Letters of Claim for Judicial Review
Letters of Claim for Medical Negligence
Letters of Claim for Professional Negligence
The law of tort is defined as a body of rights, obligations and remedies that is applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for individuals or victims (claimant or plaintiff) who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others (defendant).
Tort should immediately be distinguished from two other kinds of law, notably criminal law and contract law.
Criminal Law is concerned with crimes committed against the state which are punishable by either a fine or imprisonment. Tort is between individuals with the primary remedy being that of damages paid from one individual to another for the damage that they have suffered.
Criminal Law is presided over in the criminal courts whereas tort law is presided over in the civil courts.
Contract law is concerned with contracts between two parties which come in the form of an agreement between those two parties. The law of tort on the other hand is imposed by the law irrespective of what either party desires to be the case.
There is however similarities between the systems of law, most notably with criminal liability in tort it is also imposed by the state and with contract the way in which compensation or damages is used as an appropriate remedy.
There can also be cases where actions can be brought both in a criminal action and a civil action. The offences against the person such as assault and battery can both be brought as a criminal and civil action.
Any individual can sue using the law of tort. There is the potential for children, children who are born with disabilities due to harm inflicted prior to birth and even husband and wife to sue each other. These are some examples of the way the law has been developed to include certain individuals.
The following are examples of parties who can have an action brought against them in the law of tort:
There are four elements to a tort, each of which needs to be present for a remedy to be provided. They are as follows:
For a tort to occur the defendant for an action must owe a legal duty to the victim of the tort. The obligation of duty is legally enforceable and requires an individual to exhibit behaviour which is of a certain standard. In most cases this is concerned with what an ordinary person would do in that situation with the general duty often being to prevent foreseeable injury or damage to a victim.
For a tort to occur the defendant for an action must have breached the duty that was legally imposed on him.
The breach of the legally imposed duty must have caused damage or injury, whether directly or indirectly to the victim.
There must be damage or injury. This does not necessarily have to be physical damage or injury it could be monetary or often emotional distress or embarrassment are included.
The tort of negligence is probably the most famous tort and can be found in such areas as the driving of automobiles to the administering of medical practices. For a claim of negligence to be found in these areas the following thus needs to be established:
Economic torts are defined as torts that have inflicted pure economic loss and which are not concerned with physical damage or injury to another person. One of the best examples of an economic tort happening in the course of business is that of passing off whereby an individual or business attempts to pass of their goods as the goods of another relying on the substantial goodwill associated with the original product or goods.
For a tort action there are two principal remedies which are as follows:
The following are defences to tort actions:
This is where the tort was committed by an employee while he was undertaking his duties or employment, i.e. that there was a close and direct connection with the harmful act committed by the employee and what he was employed to do.
This is a defence used whereby the claimant was said to have acted in a careless manner when looking after themselves which in fact had contributed to the injuries which they have suffered.
Volenti Non Fit Injuria can be translated simply to mean consent. Simply it means that the claimant or plaintiff cannot complain whereby he voluntary assumed the risk, i.e. if he has consented to the conduct which otherwise would have amounted to a tort.
Ask your legal question using the box below and have a response from solicitor or barrister within minutes.