The role of consent orders
A consent order can be used to record an agreement reached between the parties in respect of certain interim matters or it may also be used for the same purpose when a full settlement compromise is reached.
The order is based on a contract between the parties. Due to that contractual nature, for the order to exist and be enforceable, all elements of contractual agreement need to be present at the time when the agreement was formed.
Alternatively, a consent order can be used to act as an estoppel. Therefore, it could be employed in such a way to prevent a party from alleging matters against the other which have been compromised by the agreement.
Variation or setting aside of the orders
In principle, before the order has been drawn up, it is possible to apply back to court to have it set aside or varied. However, once the order has been prepared the party seeking the order to be set aside must have good grounds to show that misrepresentation, mistake or any other ground to set aside the contract is present. Following the consent order being perfected, the court has no power to vary it.
Whenever a party wishes to challenge a judgment or order that has the effect of finally disposing of the issues between the parties, the only available ways to achieve that result are to bring an appeal from judgment or order or to bring fresh proceedings to set it aside.
In certain specific agreements, the compromise can be embodied in what are known as Tomlin orders. Those are used where complex terms of settlement are agreed, or terms are agreed which extend beyond the boundaries of the action. Alternatively, those could be employed where the parties seek to avoid publicity of the terms agreed.
Where the compromise has been reached and it is proposed that the action be stayed on the agreed terms to be scheduled to a consent order, the minutes should be drawn up. Those should include the following or else to that effect:
“And, the claimant and the defendant having agreed to the terms set out in the annexed schedule, it is ordered that all further proceedings in this action be stayed, except for the purpose of carrying such terms into effect.”
Entering consent orders
Administrative consent orders
Certain consent orders can be entered by a purely administrative process without the need for obtaining the approval of a judge. This is provided for by the Civil Procedure Rules, in particular rule 40.6. However, the process cannot be used if one of the parties is a litigant in person (rule 40.6(2)(b)). The categories of orders which are covered by those provisions include:
- Judgment orders for the payment of money; Judgment orders for the delivery up of goods (other than specific delivery); Orders setting aside default judgments; Orders to dismiss part or the whole of the proceedings; Orders for stays on agreed terms which dispose of proceedings, including Tomlin orders; Orders for discharge of liability of any party; and Orders for the payment, waiver or assessment of cost.
For more information on:
- Consent orders approved by the court